MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2036902595 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0570

Chaplygin scalar field reconstruction of the modified ghost dark energy model

2015· article· en· W2036902595 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. Karami

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDark energyScalar fieldEquation of stateChaplygin gasDimensionless quantityDark fluidDark matterScalar field dark matterScalar (mathematics)Deceleration parameterClassical mechanicsMathematical physicsCosmologyQuantum mechanicsAstrophysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the framework of Einstein gravity, we establish a correspondence between the Chaplygin scalar field model and the modified ghost dark energy model. We consider a spatially non-flat Friedmann–Robertson–Walker universe containing modified ghost dark energy and dark matter that are in interaction with each other. We solve the differential equation governing the dimensionless modified ghost dark energy density parameter numerically. Then we obtain the evolutionary behaviors of both the energy density and equation of state parameters of the modified ghost dark energy. More interesting is that the equation of state parameter at the present time can cross the phantom divide line provided the interaction parameter b2 > 0.15 is compatible with the observations. Furthermore, we reconstruct both the Chaplygin gas scalar field and potential according to the evolutionary behavior of the modified ghost dark energy model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→