MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036903667 · doi:10.1130/g23799a.1

Escape tectonics and the extrusion of Alaska: Past, present, and future

2007· article· en· W2036903667 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T.F. Redfield, David W. Scholl, Paul G. Fitzgerald, Myrl E. Beck

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeological surveyLibrary scienceArchaeologyGeologyHistoryGeophysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| November 01, 2007 Escape tectonics and the extrusion of Alaska: Past, present, and future T. F. Redfield; T. F. Redfield 1Geological Survey of Norway, Leiv Eirikssens vei 39, 7491 Trondheim, Norway Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David W. Scholl; David W. Scholl 2Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94035, USA, and U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Paul G. Fitzgerald; Paul G. Fitzgerald 3Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Myrl E. Beck, Jr. Myrl E. Beck, Jr. 4Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information T. F. Redfield 1Geological Survey of Norway, Leiv Eirikssens vei 39, 7491 Trondheim, Norway David W. Scholl 2Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94035, USA, and U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA Paul G. Fitzgerald 3Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA Myrl E. Beck, Jr. 4Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 01 Mar 2007 Revision Received: 21 Jun 2007 Accepted: 29 Jun 2007 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 The Geological Society of America, Inc. Geology (2007) 35 (11): 1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1130/G23799A.1 Article history Received: 01 Mar 2007 Revision Received: 21 Jun 2007 Accepted: 29 Jun 2007 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation T. F. Redfield, David W. Scholl, Paul G. Fitzgerald, Myrl E. Beck; Escape tectonics and the extrusion of Alaska: Past, present, and future. Geology 2007;; 35 (11): 1039–1042. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G23799A.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract The North Pacific Rim is a tectonically active plate boundary zone, parts of which may be characterized as a laterally moving orogenic stream. Crustal blocks are transported along large-magnitude strike-slip faults in western Canada and central Alaska toward the Aleutian–Bering Sea subduction zones. Throughout much of the Cenozoic, at and west of its Alaskan nexus, the North Pacific Rim orogenic Stream (NPRS) has undergone tectonic escape. During transport, relatively rigid blocks acquired paleomagnetic rotations and fault-juxtaposed boundaries while flowing differentially through the system, from their original point of accretion and entrainment toward the free face defined by the Aleutian–Bering Sea subduction zones. Built upon classical terrane tectonics, the NPRS model provides a new framework with which to view the mobilistic nature of the western North American plate boundary zone. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207