Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sous la forme d’un message à leurs évêques à l’occasion de leur visite ad limina à Rome, les supérieurs majeurs des communautés religieuses du Canada ont pris la parole sur la situation de leurs Églises locales. Ils reconnaissent des réussites, signalent des manques, remettent en question des orientations respectant trop peu l’expérience et le discernement des croyants, souhaitent ouverture et débats. Il s’agit là d’un geste prophétique d’éveil aux questions essentielles et d’appel à considérer les personnes dans leur cheminement. Or, applaudi par des laïcs, ce message n’a pas été reçu par les évêques. Cette non-réception a créé l’événement autant que la prise de parole. Les religieux ont osé suggérer d’ouvrir à la discussion des questions même controversées. Ils souhaitent un nécessaire travail d’interprétation de la foi, de la morale et des pratiques dans les conditions culturelles actuelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".