Determinants of Ambulation in Children With Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Population-Based Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify factors that predict ambulation in spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. A 4-year registry-based birth cohort was searched for patients with a diagnosis of spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. All patients were then divided in 2 groups: (a) Gross Motor Function Classification System level < or = III (ambulant group) and (b) Gross Motor Function Classification System level > or = IV (nonambulant group). Clinical features were then compared between the 2 groups. A total of 85 children with a diagnosis of spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy were identified. Of these, 65 and 20 were classified in the ''nonambulant'' and ''ambulant'' groups, respectively. The presence of seizures in the first 24 or 72 hours of life and the administration of antibiotics during pregnancy/delivery were all associated with an eventual inability to achieve ambulation. A gestational age < or = 27 weeks, birth weight <1000 g, Caucasian mother, and the presence of hyperbilirubinemia were significantly linked with independent ambulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".