MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036950270 · doi:10.1080/10915810290169882

Photokeratitis and Other Phototoxic Effects on the Cornea and Conjunctiva

2002· review· en· W2036950270 on OpenAlex
Anthony P. Cullen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Toxicology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal Surgery and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorneaChemosisPhototoxicityConjunctivaOphthalmologyMedicineIrritationSun exposureDermatologyPathologyChemistryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Except when sleeping, the cornea and interpalpebral conjunctiva are exposed to the ambient environment, both natural and man-made. Levels of solar ultraviolet irradiance reaching the eye may exceed the damage threshold under a number of circumstances. The consequences of overexposure may be acute after a latent period, sequelae to an acute exposure, or long-term chronic effects. Previously derived action spectra for photokeratitis and photoconjunctivitis due to incoherent ultraviolet are presented. These reveal interspecies similarities for the levels of radiant energy reaching each tissue. The initial in vivo (clinical) signs of photokeratitis are due to lost or damaged epithelial cells with other signs produced by this primary response. The conjunctival signs include injection and chemosis. Chronic exposure to solar ultraviolet is a factor in climatic droplet keratopathy and pterygium. Phototoxic compounds or their by-products potentially can reach the cornea from the air, via the tears or aqueous humor, or from the limbal capillaries. However, the human cornea appears to be much less susceptible to the influence of phototoxic agents than the skin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it