MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036956020 · doi:10.1142/s0129156408005321

PASSIVE STANDOFF DETECTION OF SURFACE CONTAMINANTS: A NOVEL APPROACH BY DIFFERENTIAL POLARIZATION FTIR SPECTROMETRY

2008· article· en· W2036956020 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Marc Thériault, Hugo Lavoie, Eldon Puckrin, François Bouffard

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiancePolarization (electrochemistry)Fourier transform infrared spectroscopySkyMaterials scienceMass spectrometryOpticsRemote sensingFourier transformEnvironmental scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsPhysicsChemistryEnvironmental chemistryGeologyMeteorologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An approach for the passive standoff detection of surface contaminants by differential polarization FTIR spectrometry is proposed. The surface radiance modeling associated with the method is given. Unpolarized and polarized sensing measurements obtained with the CATSI sensor for the standoff detection of liquid agent VX deposited on high-reflectivity surfaces are presented. The analysis of results indicates that the differential polarization approach is well suited to mitigate sky radiance drifts, which favours unambiguous surface contaminant detections. An experimental and modeling study initiated to address the spectral polarization phenomenology is outlined. The design of an optimized FTIR sensor for differential polarization spectrometry measurements is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of High Speed Electronics and SystemsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207