MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037026609 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0179

Adaptive robust control of bilateral teleoperation systems with unmeasurable environmental force and arbitrary time delays

2014· article· en· W2037026609 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)TeleoperationAdaptive controlRobust controlControl engineeringComputer scienceControl (management)Stability (learning theory)Control systemEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bilateral teleoperation technology has caused wide attentions because of its applications in various remote operation systems. However, there exist some challenging control issues such as communication delay, unmeasurable environmental force, and various manipulator modelling uncertainties. In this study, the disturbance observer is designed based on the slave manipulator dynamics to observe the unmeasurable environmental force. When the environmental force is modelled as a general linear regression form, its unknown parameters can be estimated online by the least square adaptation law. A novel communication structure is proposed where only the master trajectory is transmitted to the slave side, and the transmission signal from the slave to the master is replaced by those estimated environmental parameters. Since these parameters are not power signals, the passivity problem of the communication channel and the trade‐off limitation between the transparency performance and robust stability in traditional teleoperation control are essentially avoided. The sliding mode control and the force compensation of disturbance observer are integrated subsequently to deal with various manipulator modelling uncertainties, so that the excellent synchronisation performance can be realised. Thus, the proposed control algorithm can guarantee the robust stability and the good control performance simultaneously under arbitrary time delays. The simulation and experiment on two single degree‐of‐freedom manipulators are carried out and the results show the effectiveness of the proposed control algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.145
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it