MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2037064268 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450840410

A Mortality Model for Penicillium bilaiae Subjected to Convective Air Drying

2006· article· en· W2037064268 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Timothy Friesen, Geoffrey E. Hill, Todd Pugsley, Greg Holloway

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceVariable (mathematics)Air temperatureConvectionHazardMoistureMaterials scienceMathematicsMechanicsMeteorologyBiologyComposite materialEcologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Drying of microbial cells for storage purposes is a widely practised technology. A new statistical model is proposed for survivability of microbial cells during convective air drying, where mortality is predicted by hazard functions and acceleration factors applied to temperature, moisture content and drying rate variables. The model is based on experimental survivability data generated from drying Penicillium bilaiae conidia at temperatures from 20 to 60°C and air relative humidities from 3 to 75%. Experimental data using “one at a time” variable manipulation was used to obtain five model parameters. Despite several simplifications to reduce the number of variable cross‐dependencies, the model was successfully validated using combined stress trials with maximum deviations of ±15%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering→Same topicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety→French-language works237,207→