Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poussé par le besoin d’être informé et soucieux de briser l’isolement dans lequel il vit, M gr Georges Courchesne, de Rimouski, invite à son évêché, pour des séjours plus ou moins longs, diverses personnalités, particulièrement des artistes. C’est ainsi que Gérard Morisset, Lorenzo Auger et le frère Raymondien se rencontrent à l’évêché de Rimouski en février 1935. Une partie de leur séjour se passe en de longues conversations que dirige l’évêque. On y parle beaucoup des arts et de leur place dans l’enseignement, de la restauration de l’artisanat, du projet d’une école des arts et métiers sur le modèle des écoles Saint-Luc de Belgique, de la nécessité de faire de Rimouski un centre intellectuel capable de répondre aux besoins de la région. Mais la réalisation de ces beaux rêves tarde à venir et, en 1936, M gr Courchesne organise un autre rendez-vous important qui lancera en grand l’Action catholique spécialisée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".