MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037129102 · doi:10.1063/1.1524624

Semiclassically optimized complex absorbing potentials of polynomial form. I. Pure imaginary case

2002· article· en· W2037129102 on OpenAlex
Bill Poirier, Tucker Carrington

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungWelch Foundation
KeywordsReflection (computer programming)PolynomialTransmission (telecommunications)Resonance (particle physics)PhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisOpticsAtomic physicsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an optimal, pure imaginary complex absorbing potential (CAP) of polynomial form, for calculating resonance energies and widths, photodissociation cross sections, rate constants, etc. The optimal CAP is derived by minimizing reflection from, and transmission through, the CAP. Reflection and transmission are computed semiclassically. The optimal CAP is general, and can be used at any energy and with any absorbing region width. It significantly reduces the absorbing region width required to compute resonances of the one-dimensional Hazi–Taylor system. We also clearly discuss different types of reflection, and resolve apparent discrepancies relating to optimal CAPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it