MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037157311 · doi:10.1071/rdv19n1ab387

387 EFFECT OF NUMBER OF INSEMINATIONS ON EMBRYO PRODUCTION IN SUPERSTIMULATED NELORE ( <i>BOS INDICUS</i> ) COWS SUBJECTED TO FIXED-TIME ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION

2006· article· en· W2037157311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. M. Martins, H. Ayres, José Ribamar de Souza Torres-Júnior, A.H. Souza, G. A. Bó, Pietro Sampaio Baruselli

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal scienceArtificial inseminationCloprostenolEstradiol benzoateBiologyEstrous cycleInseminationEmbryo transferSemenBeef cattleInternal medicineEndocrinologySpermEmbryoPregnancyOvulationMedicineAnatomyEstrogenHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In embryo transfer programs, 2 inseminations per superstimulated donor are usually recommended. Based on studies of follicular dynamics in Bos indicus donors (Baruselli et al . 2006 Theriogenology 65, 77–88), we tested the hypothesis that a single fixed-time AI (FTAI) at 16 h after pituitary luteinizing hormone (pLH) treatment is as efficacious as 2 FTAI at 12 and 24 h after the pLH treatment. Suckling Nelore cows ( n = 10), 60 ± 12 days postpartum, were equally distributed in 2 experimental groups: G-1TAI vs. G-2TAI, in a crossover design. All animals received an intravaginal progesterone device (DIB; Syntex S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina) and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (IM, Ric Be; Syntex) at random stages of the estrous cycle (Day 0). Superstimulatory treatments started on Day 4 with pFSH (133 mg; Folltropin-V; Bioniche Animal Health Canada, Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada) in 8 decreasing doses, given IM 12 h apart. On Day 6, all cows received 2 (AM and PM) treatments of 0.15 mg of d-cloprostenol (Prolise; Syntex). The DIB devices were removed 36 h after the first PGF2± injection. The pLH treatment (25 mg IM; Lutropin-V; Bioniche) was given 48 h after the first PGF2± treatment (12 h after the last pFSH treatment). In the G-2TAI group, all cows received 2 inseminations (12 and 24 h after the pLH). Cows in the G-1TAI group received a single insemination (16 h after the pLH). All inseminations were done with the same batch of semen from a single bull. Ultrasound examinations (PIE Medical Scanner 200; Pie Medical Equipment, Maastricht, The Netherlands) were performed every 12 h from 0 to 72 h after pLH treatment to evaluate the number of ovulatory follicles (&amp;lt;8 mm), the ovulation rate, and the time of ovulation. Variables were analyzed by ANOVA and chi-square test. The homogeneity of the variances (distribution of ovulations) was analyzed by Bartlett's test. Conclusions were based on a 5% level of significance. The results for G-1TAI and G-2TAI were, respectively: number of follicles &amp;gt;8 mm at the time of pLH administration (16.2 ± 1.4 vs. 14.8 ± 1.2; P &amp;gt; 0.05), ovulation rate (63.8 ± 3.8% vs. 64.2 ± 4.3%; P &amp;gt; 0.05), interval from the first to the last ovulation (32.4 ± 1.8 vs. 33.6 ± 1.6 h; P &amp;gt; 0.05), total ova/embryos (8.2 ± 0.9 vs. 7.2 ± 0.8; P &amp;gt; 0.05), Grade 1 embryos (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4; P &amp;gt; 0.05), transferable embryos (Grades 1, 2, and 3) (4.3 ± 0.7 vs. 4.2 ± 0.6; P &amp;gt; 0.05), freezable embryos (Grades 1 and 2) (2.9 ± 0.6 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4; P &amp;gt; 0.05), unfertilized ova (0.6 ± 0.2 vs. 0.8 ± 0.2; P &amp;gt; 0.05), and degenerated embryos (3.3 ± 0.9 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3; P &amp;gt; 0.05). These results suggest no significant differences in embryo production between superstimulated Nelore donors inseminated once or twice by fixed time following administration of pLH. This work was supported by Tecnopec, Brazil .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207