MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037163799 · doi:10.1002/cm.10019

Post‐karyokinesis centrosome movement leaves a trail of unanswered questions

2002· review· en· W2037163799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Motility and the Cytoskeleton · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
KeywordsCentrosomeBiologyCentrioleCytokinesisCentrosome cycleCell biologyMitosisMicrotubule organizing centerInterphaseCell divisionMicrotubuleCytoskeletonSpindle pole bodyCell cycleSpindle apparatusCellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The centrosome is a complex structure composed of a large number of proteins (pericentriolar material, PCM) usually organized around a pair of centrioles (or a centriole duplex). This structure is capable of nucleating and organizing microtubules, duplication, and motility. In general, episodes of dramatic centrosome movement correlate with periods of cellular reorganization and nowhere is cellular reorganization more apparent, or more important, than in the periods before and after cell division. It is now clear that centrosome movement occurs not only prior to cell division but also at its completion, in concert with cytokinesis. The focus of this review is the newly emerging picture of centrosome activity during the post-karyokinesis period and the role that this activity might play in the transition of cells from mitosis to interphase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it