Analysis of wind speed and power time series preceding wind ramp events
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wind energy has become one of the fastest growing renewable sources during last few decades. Sudden changes in wind power output, called wind ramps, recently attracted great research interest in wind power forecasting community. Conventional ramp prediction methods derive future ramp estimates from power forecast series. We suggest to analyze real wind power series or other weather parameters, searching for specific patterns and dependencies indicating forthcoming wind ramp events.This paper presents a methodology for parametric analysis of time series preceding wind ramp events. The presented methodology is based on probabilistic data analysis. Sensitivity of the developed algorithm can be adjusted through the size of the time window defined before a ramp event. Power production and other weather data are standardized, averaged and then searched for specific patterns in the form of trend lines. The resulting methodology does not require the use of a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model; this is a significant simplification compared to most conventional methods. The proposed methodology is tested using power production and wind speed data collected between August 2011 and July 2012 at a wind farm located in a wind-rich region of southern Alberta, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".