MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single and Double Ionization of Corannulene and Coronene

2001· article· en· W2037219281 on OpenAlexaff
Detlef Schröder, Jessica Loos, Helmut Schwarz, R. Thissen, Dorin V. Preda, Lawrence T. Scott, Doina Caraiman, Maxim V. Frach, Diethard K. Böhme

Bibliographic record

VenueHelvetica Chimica Acta · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoroneneChemistryDicationPhotoionizationCorannuleneIonizationMass spectrometryIonHexafluorobenzeneIonization energyAtomic physicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electron-transfer processes that involve single and doubly charged cations of corannulene (C20H10) and coronene (C24H12) are examined by three different mass-spectrometric techniques. Photoionization studies give first-ionization energies of IE(C20H10)=7.83±0.02 eV and IE(C24H12)=7.21 ±0.02 eV. Photoionizations of the neutrals to the doubly charged cations occur at thresholds of 20.1±0.2 eV and 18.5±0.2 eV for corannulene and coronene, respectively. Energy-resolved charge-stripping mass spectrometry yields kinetic energy deficits of Qmin(C20H=13.8±0.3 eV and Qmin(C24H=12.8±0.3 eV for the transitions from the mono- to the corresponding dications in keV collisions. Reactivity studies of the C20H and C24H dications in a selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometer are used to determine the onsets for the occurrence of single-electron transfer from several neutral reagents to the dications, affording two different monocationic products. With decreasing IEs of the neutral reagents, electron transfer to doubly charged corannulene is first observed with hexafluorobenzene (IE=9.91 eV), while neutrals with lower IEs are required in the case of the coronene dication, e.g., NO2 (IE=9.75 eV). Density-functional theory is used to support the interpretation of the experimental data. The best estimates of the ionization energies evaluated are IE(C20H10)=7.83±0.02 eV and IE(C24H12)=7.21 ±0.02 eV for the neutral molecules, and IE(C20H)=12.3±0.2 eV and IE(C24H)=11.3±0.2 eV for the monocations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelvetica Chimica ActaSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207