MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037228923 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.1367

P3‐148: Does a history of migraines increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia?

2012· article· en· W2037228923 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rebecca Morton, Suzanne L. Tyas

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaMigraineVascular dementiaMedicineStroke (engine)Family historyDepression (economics)Odds ratioConfoundingHeadachesAlzheimer's diseaseDiseasePsychiatryPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dementia is the most co mmon neurological disease in older adults, while headaches are the most common neurological disorder across all ages. Migraines are a common form of headache disorders that affect millions of people worldwide. Both neurological disorders—dementia and migraines—cause significant impairment for the individual, as well as substantial economic impact on society. The relationship between migraines and dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD), has not yet been thoroughly explored. Analyses were based on 716 participants 65+ years from the Manitoba Study of Health and Aging in Canada. Participants screened cognitively intact at baseline, had complete data on migraine history and all covariates at baseline, and were assessed for cognitive outcomes five years later according to standard diagnostic criteria (dementia: DSM-IV; AD: NINCDS-ADRDA; VaD: NINDS-AIREN). The exposure (history of migraines), confounding (age, sex, education, depression) and intervening (hypertension, diabetes, stroke, myocardial infarction and other heart conditions) variables were based on self-report, and their association with dementia, AD and VaD was assessed using multiple logistic regression models. Individuals with a history of migraines were almost three times more likely (odds ratio [OR]=2.97; 95% CI=1.25–6.61) to develop dementia and approximately four times more likely (OR=4.22; 95% CI: 1.59–10.42) to develop AD compared to those without a history of migraines. A history of migraines was not significantly associated with VaD either before (OR=1.83; 95% CI: 0.39–8.52) or after (OR=1.52; 95% CI: 0.20–7.23) adjustment for confounding and intervening variables. Migraines are a significant risk factor for AD. In this study, the relationship between migraines and overall dementia was apparently driven by the strong relationship between migraines and AD. Despite the vascular mechanisms involved in migraine biology, a history of migraines was not a significant risk factor for VaD. Recognition of the long-term detrimental consequences of migraines for AD has implications for the importance of migraine prevention and management as well as for our understanding of AD etiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207