MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037229411 · doi:10.1210/en.2003-0829

Biosynthesis of Proopiomelanocortin-Derived Peptides in Prohormone Convertase 2 and 7B2 Null Mice

2003· article· en· W2037229411 on OpenAlexafffund
Virginie Laurent, Lisa Jaubert-Miazza, Roxane Desjardins, Robert Day, Iris Lindberg

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrinology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute on Drug AbuseCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsProopiomelanocortinProhormoneProhormone convertaseBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineNull cellBiochemistryHormoneGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prohormone convertases (PCs) are thought to represent the major proteinases involved in the biosynthetic processing of peptide hormone precursors to bioactive peptide products. The maturation of PC2 requires the aid of a helper protein, 7B2, in order for the zymogen to become an active enzyme species. The 7B2 and PC2 nulls should thus be functionally equivalent with regard to deficits in precursor processing. In this article, we have examined this proposition through the study of proopiomelanocortin (POMC) biosynthesis and granule content in both null models. RIA data indicate that both PC2 and 7B2 nulls lack pituitary alpha-MSH; interestingly, 7B2 nulls are still able to generate beta-endorphin from beta-lipotropin, whereas PC2 nulls contain little if any beta-endorphin. Labeling experiments demonstrate a build-up of POMC, high molecular weight intermediates, and intact ACTH, as well as the disappearance of alpha-MSH, in both null models. Electron microscopy of neurointermediate lobe melanotrophs reveals the presence of a significantly greater number of secretory granules in both 7B2 and PC2 nulls compared with wild-type controls. However, PC2 null melanotrophs contain twice as many granules as 7B2 null melanotrophs. Another difference between the two null models is a relatively enhanced accumulation of precursors in the PC2 null compared with the 7B2 null; these include not only PC2 substrates, but also presumed PC1 substrates. These data indicate that the two nulls are not phenotypically equivalent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndocrinologySame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207