MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037261329 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450850212

A Fully Continuous Supercritical Fluid Extraction System for Contaminated Soil

2007· article· en· W2037261329 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
M. E. Ryan, Warren Stiver

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersOntario Ministry of Food and AgricultureUniversity of GuelphU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsSlurrySupercritical fluid extractionLoamSupercritical fluidNaphthaleneExtraction (chemistry)Supercritical carbon dioxideCarbon dioxideChemistryContinuous flowEnvironmental scienceChromatographySoil waterAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Environmental engineeringSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A fully continuous lab scale supercritical fluid extraction system has been designed, built and tested. The system continuously pumps carbon dioxide under supercritical conditions and soil slurry into a counter‐current contacting column. Delhi Loamy Sand, spiked with approximately 10 mg/g of naphthalene, was used as the testing soil. The soil slurry ranged from 0.0028 g dry soil per g slurry to 0.072 g/g. The operating temperature was 43°C and the operating pressure was 7.7 MPa. Near steady state, fully continuous flow was achieved with runs lasting as long as 2 h. All carbon dioxide samples contained measurable quantities of naphthalene and the measured mass transfer coefficients were as high as 4.6×10−4 s−1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207