MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037272116 · doi:10.1139/v06-127

Buffer capacity in multiple chemical reaction systems involving solid phases

2006· article· en· W2037272116 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStoichiometryBuffer (optical fiber)ChemistryChemical reactionKey (lock)Chemical equilibriumBuffer solutionComputer sciencePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The buffer capacity of a chemical species in a multiple chemical reaction system is discussed in terms of a special class of stoichiometrically unique reactions referred to as response reactions (RERs). More specifically, it is shown that the buffer capacity may be partitioned into a sum of contributions associated with RERs. This finding provides a deeper understanding of the factors that determine the buffer capacity. In particular, the main contributions to the buffer capacity come from the RERs involving the most abundant species. Concomitantly, the RERs approach provides a simple stoichiometric algorithm for the derivation and analysis of the buffer capacity that may be easily implemented into a computer software.Key words: buffer capacity, response reaction, heterogeneous system, stoichiometric coefficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it