MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037299718 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2012.6345113

Adapting DFIGs for doubly-fed induction motors operation

2012· article· en· W2037299718 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction generatorControl theory (sociology)Electronic speed controlTorqueInduction motorEngineeringWind powerRotor (electric)Control engineeringComputer scienceControl (management)Electrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper researches on: (i) adaptation of the popular 1.5 MW doubly-fed induction generators (DFIGs) used in wind farms for the motor market; (ii) the characteristics of the adapted DFIMs. The paper shows that the DFIM has 4-quadrant operation: positive speed motoring extending to 2 pu, regenerative braking, negative speed motoring and braking at negative speed. In order to exploit existing economic design based on rotor-side VSCs de-rated at maximum slip of 0.3, autotransformers are required for starting and operation in the extended speed range. Using decoupled P-Q control developed for DFIGs, the DFIMs have capability to operate at unity or leading power factor and as a precision speed and position controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207