Cloning, molecular characterization, and expression analysis of several red clover cDNAs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To begin gathering information regarding nucleotide sequence similarity between red clover genes and other plant species, especially the model legume Medicago truncatula, several random red clover cDNAs were sequenced. The analyzed cDNAs included genes encoding actin; several proteins involved in photosynthesis including PsaH, PsbR, PsbX, early light-induced protein (ELIP), ferredoxin, chlorophyll a/b binding protein; fructose-bisphosphate aldolase;chloroplastic superoxide dismutase; and GTP-binding protein typA. The gene set had a median sequence identity of 92% with their counterparts from M. truncatula, suggesting its available genomics tools can be applied to red clover. An expression analysis of the gene set in various red clover tissues indicates the genes show a wide range of expression patterns. Consequently, this set of cDNAs and associated data are proving useful as controls in molecular genetic experiments involving red clover. Key words: Red clover, Trifolium pratense, Medicago truncatula, forage legume, genomics, inquiry-based learning
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".