Performance Analysis of Space Modulation Techniques over alpha - mu Fading Channels with Imperfect Channel Estimation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes the performance of space modulation techniques over generalized fading channels with imperfect channel estimation. In particular, a unified approach for calculating the pairwise error probability (PEP) of spatial modulation (SM) and space shift keying (SSK) modulation techniques for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) wireless communication systems is presented. A new, simple, and exact closed-form expression for the PEP over generalized α-μ fading channels under imperfect channel state information (CSI) is derived. The PEP expression considers the joint distributions of the envelope and the phase of the fading channel. Furthermore, the derived PEP and the union bound technique are used to obtain a closed-form expression for the average bit error rate (BER). The influence of the fading parameters α and μ and the channel estimation error on the system performance is analyzed and discussed through representative numerical examples. The correctness of our derivations is validated by means of MonteCarlo simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it