The 2012 Salary Survey of Public and Private Sector Fisheries Employers in the United States and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FisheriesVolume 38, Issue 4 p. 169-178 Special The 2012 Salary Survey of Public and Private Sector Fisheries Employers in the United States and Canada Correction(s) for this article Correction Volume 38Issue 8Fisheries pages: 351-351 First Published online: August 14, 2013 Kenneth F. Kurzawski, Kenneth F. Kurzawski ken.kurzawski@tpwd.state.tx.us Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, TX, 78744Search for more papers by this authorWilliam L. Fisher, William L. Fisher Department of Natural Resources, Fernow Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853Search for more papers by this authorDirk Miller, Dirk Miller Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 5400 Bishop Boulevard, Cheyenne, WY, 82006Search for more papers by this authorJames M. Long, James M. Long Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, 007 Agriculture Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078Search for more papers by this author Kenneth F. Kurzawski, Kenneth F. Kurzawski ken.kurzawski@tpwd.state.tx.us Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, TX, 78744Search for more papers by this authorWilliam L. Fisher, William L. Fisher Department of Natural Resources, Fernow Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853Search for more papers by this authorDirk Miller, Dirk Miller Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 5400 Bishop Boulevard, Cheyenne, WY, 82006Search for more papers by this authorJames M. Long, James M. Long Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, 007 Agriculture Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078Search for more papers by this author First published: 15 April 2013 https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2013.777668Citations: 1Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume38, Issue4April 2013Pages 169-178 RelatedInformation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".