Role of the fourth intracellular loop of D1‐like dopaminergic receptors in conferring subtype‐specific signaling properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate whether the fourth intracellular loop (IL4) of D1 and D5 dopaminergic receptors (D1R, D5R) confers D1-like subtype-specific signaling properties. Using chimeric receptors (D1R-IL4B and D5R-IL4A), we show that swapping of IL4 leads to a switch in dopamine affinity and constitutive activity of D1R and D5R. Dopamine potency was reduced for both chimeras in comparison with wild-type receptors. Moreover, dopamine-mediated maximal activation was drastically increased in cells expressing D1R-IL4B when compared with those harboring D5R-IL4A or wild-type receptors. In conclusion, IL4 plays a pivotal role in imparting subtype-specific ligand binding and activation properties to highly homologous seven-transmembrane receptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".