MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037388690 · doi:10.1517/14740330903188413

Statins and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: preoperative and postoperative efficacy and safety

2009· review· en· W2037388690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Drug Safety · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeStatinCoronary artery diseaseAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineCardiologyCardiopulmonary bypassCoronary artery bypass surgeryArteryRevascularizationAdverse effectSurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In patients with native coronary artery disease, strong evidence supports the use of statins to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and improve survival. However, for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), statins appear to be underutilized, and concerns have been raised regarding their perioperative safety. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of statin therapy before and after coronary surgical revascularization. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to retrieve relevant articles from the Medline database published between 1987 and January 2009. RESULTS: Administered before CABG, statins have been demonstrated to reduce perioperative mortality, stroke and atrial fibrillation. Preoperative statin therapy also reduces the systemic inflammatory response associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. Following CABG, statins inhibit saphenous vein graft disease and the progression of atherosclerosis in native coronary arteries. In addition, postoperative statins reduce the recurrence of cardiovascular events and improve all-cause mortality. High-intensity lipid reduction to achieve low-density lipoprotein levels to 70 mg/dl may benefit post-CABG patients, but this has yet to be evaluated prospectively. Adverse effects related to perioperative statin therapy seem to be extremely rare, and little data are available to support the practice of withholding statin therapy before or after surgery. CONCLUSION: Numerous studies have demonstrated that statins improve the outcomes of patients undergoing CABG. The benefits seem to outweigh the risks associated with their use, both in the preoperative and postoperative period. In the absence of contraindications, essentially all CABG patients are candidates for life-long statin therapy that ideally should be started before surgery. The optimal postoperative statin regimen remains unknown and should be the subject of future study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it