Quantifying System Adequacy Benefit of Wind Power Diversity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electric energy generation from renewable sources has received considerable public support due to growing concerns about adverse environmental impacts from conventional energy sources. As wind power is environmentally friendly and suitable for bulk power generation, it is one of the fastest growing energy sources in meeting global electric energy demand. Many electric power systems are being connected to multiple wind farms that have diverse wind speed characteristics. Power systems with large wind power penetrations are subject to large fluctuations in power generation causing considerable reliability concerns in system planning and operation. Diversity in wind farms characteristics helps mitigate overall power fluctuations, and can therefore have considerable influence in system reliability. This paper analyzes wind site profiles in Saskatchewan and quantifies the benefit of wind farm diversification in the overall generation adequacy of the electric power system in Saskatchewan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it