Dynamics of internalization and sequestration of guanylyl cyclase/atrial natriuretic peptide receptor-A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The guanylyl cyclase/natriuretic peptide receptor-A (NPRA), also referred to as GC-A, is a single polypeptide molecule. In its mature form, NPRA resides in the plasma membrane and consists of an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a single transmembrane-spanning region, and intracellular cytoplasmic domain that contains a protein kinase-like homology domain (KHD) and a guanylyl cyclase (GC) catalytic active site. The binding of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) to NPRA occurs at the plasma membrane; the receptor is synthesized on the polyribosomes of the endoplasmic reticulum, and is presumably degraded within the lysosomes. It is apparent that NPRA is a dynamic cellular macromolecule that traverses through different compartments of the cell through its lifetime. This review describes the experiments addressing the interaction of ANP with the NPRA, the receptor-mediated internalization and stoichiometric distribution of ANP-NPRA complexes from cell surface to cell interior, and its release into culture media. It is hypothesized that after internalization, the ligand-receptor complexes dissociate inside the cell and a population of NPRA recycles back to plasma membrane. Subsequently, some of the dissociated ligand molecules escape the lysosomal degradative pathway and are released intact into culture media, which reenter the cell by retroendocytotic mechanisms. By utilizing the pharmacologic and physiologic perturbants, the emphasis has been placed on the cellular regulation and processing of ligand-receptor complexes in intact cells. I conclude the discussion by examining the data available on the utilization of deletion mutations of NPRA cDNA, which has afforded experimental insights into the mechanisms the cell utilizes in modulating the expression and functioning of NPRA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".