Examining the impact of the ocean environment on cetacean classification using theocean acoustics and seismic exploration synthesis (OASES) propagation model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is now in wide use to study cetaceans in their natural habitats. Since cetaceans can be found in all ocean basins, their habitats cover diverse underwater environments. Properties of the ocean environment such as the sound speed profile, bathymetry, and sediment properties can be markedly different between these diverse environments. This leads to differences in how a cetacean vocalization is distorted by propagation effects and may impact the accuracy of PAM systems. To develop an automatic PAM system capable of operating effectively under numerous environmental conditions one must understand how propagation conditions affect these systems. Previous effort using a relatively limited data set has shown that a prototype aural classifier developed at Defence R&D Canada can be used to reduce false alarm rates and successfully discriminate cetacean vocalizations from several species. The aural classifier achieves accurate results by using perceptual signal features that model the features employed by the human auditory system. The current work uses the OASES pulse propagation model to examine the robustness of the classifier under various environmental conditions; preliminary results will be presented from cetacean vocalizations that were transmitted over several ranges through environments modeled using conditions measured during experimental trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".