MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037548211 · doi:10.1002/app.39498

Shear effect in beta‐phase induction of polypropylene in a single screw extruder

2013· article· en· W2037548211 on OpenAlexaff
Fabiola Navarro‐Pardo, Julio Laria, Tomás Lozano, Ana Beatriz Morales–Cepeda, Pierre G. Lafleur, S. Sánchez‐Valdés, Francisco Rodríguez‐González

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsCircuit breakerBody orificeMaterials sciencePlastics extrusionComposite materialPolypropylenePolymerShear (geology)Phase (matter)Mechanical engineeringChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In this work, we investigated the effect of four different configurations at the exit of a single‐screw extruder on the induction of beta phase in PP for four different rotational speeds. The configuration of a breaker plate with 120 orifices of 1‐mm diameter and 7‐mm length each, give the highest content of beta‐phase (56.92%), for a screw rotational speed of 20 rpm. It was due to the shear caused separation of the melt when it passes through the orifices of the breaker plate. The breaker plate of configuration 4 (breaker plate with the greatest number of orifices) provided the largest number of contacts between the melt and the orifice walls resulting in chain alignment. The results show that the beta‐phase can be induced in the polymer without any further additives, especially without any nucleating agents, but rather by using a special breaker plate configuration at the exit of the single‐screw extruder. The skin‐core structure of the polymer was only developed with one type of extruder configuration. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 2932–2937, 2013

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207