Establishment of an architecture-specific experimental validation approach for finite element modeling of bone by rapid prototyping and high resolution computed tomography
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new experimental validation method for assessing the accuracy of large-scale finite element (FE) models of bone micro-structure at the apparent and tissue level was developed. Augmented scaled bone replicas were built using rapid prototype machines based on micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) data. The geometric accuracy of the model was evaluated by comparing experimental tests with the replicas to the FE solution based on the same micro-CT data. A new version of the large-scale FE solver was developed to incorporate orthotropic material properties, hence the experimentally determined properties of the rapid prototype material were input into the FE models. The modified FE solver predicted the experimental apparent level stiffness within less than 1%, and the difference between experimental strain gauge measurements and FE-calculated surface stresses was 7% and 49% on a flat and curved surface region, respectively. While absolute error estimates of surface stresses were limited due to strain gauge errors, the relatively larger difference on the curved surface is indicative of the limitations of a hexahedron FE model for representing such geometries. Although the validation approach is applied here for hexahedron based meshes, the method is flexible for varying bone architectures and will be important for validation of future large-scale FE modeling developments that utilize techniques such as mesh smoothing and tetrahedron elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it