MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037590627 · doi:10.1002/uog.11160

Yolk sac number does not predict reliably amnionicity in monochorionic twin pregnancies: a case of a monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy with two distinct yolk sacs on early first‐trimester ultrasound

2012· article· en· W2037590627 on OpenAlexaff
Shannon Corbett, Doron Shmorgun

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsOttawa Fertility CentreUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYolk sacMedicineMonochorionic twinsConjoined twinsPregnancyObstetricsGestationTwin PregnancyUltrasoundAmnionFetusEmbryoBiologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dramatic increase in multiple births over the past 30 years has made multiple pregnancy one of the most common high-risk conditions encountered by obstetricians. In North America, the rate of multiple pregnancy has increased by 50–70% and this is largely attributed to advanced reproductive technologies1, 2. In monochorionic multiple gestations the determination of amnionicity is technically difficult to perform based both on the relatively late appearance of the amnion on ultrasound, typically between 8 and 10 weeks, along with the thin nature of the membrane. Previous studies have suggested that on early first-trimester ultrasound, monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancies can be reliably characterized by the presence of a single yolk sac and monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twins can be reliably characterized by the identification of two yolk sacs3. Accurate and early prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of amnionicity, along with enhanced prenatal/neonatal care, has been shown to decrease the mortality rates of MCMA twins from 50% to 10–20% in more recent years2. Recently, the accuracy of using yolk sac number as a means of predicting amnionicity has been challenged4-6. In a recent series of 22 cases of monochorionic multiple gestations, Shen et al.4 revealed that 85% of the 20 cases of MCDA gestations had two yolk sacs and that 15% were characterized by only a single yolk sac; a single case of MCMA was identified in this series and one yolk sac was seen. In 2010, three cases of MCMA twins characterized by the presence of two yolk sacs on first-trimester ultrasound were reported5, 6. Here, we present a fourth case of MCMA twins in which early first-trimester ultrasound demonstrated the presence of two yolks sacs with confirmed monoamnionicity in the late first trimester. A 31-year-old G1P0 Caucasian woman presented at a private fertility clinic for intrauterine insemination with donor sperm for social reasons. A transvaginal ultrasound examination (E8, GE Medical Systems, Zipf, Austria) was performed at 7 + 0 weeks for confirmation of intrauterine pregnancy. The 7-week ultrasound clearly demonstrated two distinct fetal poles and two separate yolk sacs. The crown–rump length measurements, of 7.6 mm and 7.9 mm, were consistent with the expected size for each fetal pole, and cardiac activity was present in both. The pregnancy was considered to be MCDA twin gestation at this point in time, based on the presence of two yolk sacs (Figure 1). At 9 + 2 weeks a single amniotic sac was observed with the absence of a dividing intergestational membrane (Figure 2). At 12 + 2 weeks of gestation, ultrasound demonstrated the absence of a dividing membrane between the fetuses (Figure 3). Power Doppler at this time revealed umbilical cord entanglement, confirming the diagnosis of a MCMA twin gestation (Figure 4). Transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks' gestation demonstrated two yolk sacs in a monochorionic twin pregnancy. Repeat transvaginal ultrasound at 9 + 2 weeks revealed a single amniotic sac and the absence of an intergestational membrane. Transvaginal ultrasound at 12 + 2 weeks demonstrated the absence of a dividing membrane. Transvaginal ultrasound at 12 + 2 weeks verified umbilical cord entanglement. This case highlights the close proximity in the sequence of development of the yolk sac and amnion and emphasizes our lack of understanding of the temporal differentiation of these structures. The almost simultaneous development of the yolk sac and amnion could explain these most recent findings that yolk sac number does not always correlate with amnionicity in monochorionic gestations. Yolk sac number should no longer be considered a reliable means of diagnosing amnionicity on early first-trimester ultrasound. The consequent clinical implications are an enhanced focus on the diagnosis of amnionicity based on the presence or absence of the intergestational amnion and the visualization of umbilical cord entanglement7, 8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207