MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037596650 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014657

The physical properties of the dust in the RCW 120 H ii region as seen by<i>Herschel</i>

2010· article· en· W2037596650 on OpenAlexaff
L. D. Anderson, A. Zavagno, J. A. Rodón, D. Russeil, A. Abergel, P. A. R. Ade, Paulo André, H. Arab, J.‐P. Baluteau, J.-P. Bernard, K. Blagrave, S. Bontemps, F. Boulanger, Martin Cohen, M. Compiègne, P. Cox, E. Dartois, G. R. Davis, R. Emery, T. Fulton, C. Gry, E. Habart, M. Huang, C. Joblin, Scott C. Jones, J. M. Kirk, G. Lagache, Tze Yean Lim, S. C. Madden, G. Makiwa, P. G. Martin, M.-A. Miville-Deschênes, S. Molinari, H. Moseley, F. Motte, D. A. Naylor, K. Okumura, D. Pinheiro Gonçalves, E. T. Polehampton, P. Saraceno, M. Sauvage, S. Sidher, Locke D. Spencer, B. M. Swinyard, D. Ward–Thompson, G. J. White

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
FundersNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesCentro de Instrumentación Científico-Técnica, Universidad de JaénMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieScience and Technology Facilities CouncilBundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und TechnologieCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyAgence Nationale de la RechercheImperial College LondonCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsPhysicsSpectral energy distributionAstrophysicsCosmic dustPhotometry (optics)WavelengthStar formationInfraredEmissivityCeilometerAstronomyGalaxyStarsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. RCW 120 is a well-studied, nearby Galactic H ii region with ongoing star formation in its surroundings. Previous work has shown that it displays a bubble morphology at mid-infrared wavelengths, and has a massive layer of collected neutral material seen at sub-mm wavelengths. Given the well-defined photo-dissociation region (PDR) boundary and collected layer, it is an excellent laboratory to study the “collect and collapse” process of triggered star formation. Using Herschel Space Observatory data at 100, 160, 250, 350, and 500 μm, in combination with Spitzer and APEX-LABOCA data, we can for the first time map the entire spectral energy distribution of an H ii region at high angular resolution.Aims. We seek a better understanding of RCW 120 and its local environment by analysing its dust temperature distribution. Additionally, we wish to understand how the dust emissivity index, β, is related to the dust temperature.Methods. We determine dust temperatures in selected regions of the RCW 120 field by fitting their spectral energy distribution (SED), derived using aperture photometry. Additionally, we fit the SED extracted from a grid of positions to create a temperature map.Results. We find a gradient in dust temperature, ranging from 30 K in the interior of RCW 120, to ~20 K for the material collected in the PDR, to ~10 K toward local infrared dark clouds and cold filaments. There is an additional, hotter (~100 K) component to the dust emission that we do not investigate here. Our results suggest that RCW 120 is in the process of destroying the PDR delineating its bubble morphology. The leaked radiation from its interior may influence the creation of the next generation of stars. We find support for an anti-correlation between the fitted temperature and β, in rough agreement with what has been found previously. The extended wavelength coverage of the Herschel data greatly increases the reliability of this result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207