Fascist Era Elites (1). Family matters: ministerial elites and the articulation of the Francoist dictatorship
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The question of the integration of ‘political families’ in the New State, and its position at the various centres of decision making, is essential in understanding Francoism, not so much its nature (how ‘fascist’ it was), as its shifting policies. In order to explain the relationship between the regime and these families, this paper addresses the following four aspects: 1. The birth of the regime from a historical perspective and how the different forces of the Francoist coalition integrated themselves into the new institutions; 2. How the dictator articulated his power in the nascent New State and his relations to those political families; 3. The composition, functions, means and political power of the single party, the Falange, during the ‘Fascist’ period of 1939–1945; and finally, 4. The permanent organizational arrangement, both formal and informal, which shaped the dictatorship’s mechanisms for decision making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".