MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037611902 · doi:10.1021/bi034341b

Hexamerization of RepA from the <i>Escherichia coli</i> Plasmid pKL1

2003· article· en· W2037611902 on OpenAlexaff
Ján Burian, Juan Ausió, Barry M. Phipps, Susan C. Moore, Douglas R. Dougan, William W. Kay

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmidEscherichia coliGeneBiologyEscherichia coli ProteinsOrigin of replicationGeneticsChemistryMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Escherichia coli plasmid pKL1 is one of the smallest bacterial plasmids. It encodes a single, autoregulating structural gene, repA, responsible for replication and copy number control. The oligomerization of RepA was previously proposed as the basis of a strategy for pKL1 copy number control. To elucidate the oligomerization properties of RepA in solution, RepA was expressed in E. coli; purified by ion exchange and hydrophobic chromatography; and examined in solution by spectrapolarimetry, light scattering, sedimentation velocity, and equilibrium ultracentrifugation. RepA behaved as a concentration-dependent equilibrium of dimers and hexamers. Conformational parameters of the RepA hexameric complex were determined. These results support the proposed autogenous regulatory model whereby RepA hexamers negatively regulate repA expression thereby affecting the copy number control of pKL1. RepA of pKL1 is the first plasmid replication initiation protein documented to be in dimeric-hexameric forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207