“Shame upon you as men!”: Contesting Authority in the Aftermath of Montreal’s Gavazzi Riot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’apparition en juin 1853 d’Alessandro Gavazzi à Montréal provoqua une violente émeute sectaire qui fit 10 morts et quantité de blessés. Les élites canadiennes-françaises et irlandaises de la ville furent scandalisées que les protestants locaux eurent invité le charismatique conférencier anticatholique à Montréal. Les élites anglo-saxonnes, entre-temps, virent dans l’émeute une attaque à la liberté de parole et à leur vision d’une ville ordonnée. Les débats qui éclatèrent dans la foulée de l’émeute offrent un aperçu du débat sur l’identité qui avait cours dans le Montréal du milieu du XIX e siècle. L’affrontement des notions de décorum public, d’espace urbain et de décence masculine et féminine fut au cœur de ces discussions. Les élites canadiennes-françaises, anglo-saxonnes protestantes et irlando-catholiques de la ville interprétèrent les répercussions de l’émeute de façon à justifier leurs revendications rivales à l’égard du pouvoir et de l’autorité durant une période d’intense changement culturel et démographique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.045 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".