MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037648017 · doi:10.1002/rcm.4367

Derivatization of fatty alcohol ethoxylate non‐ionic surfactants using 2‐sulfobenzoic anhydride for characterization by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry

2009· article· en· W2037648017 on OpenAlexaff
Chengli Zu, Herbert N. Praay, Bruce M. Bell, O. David Redwine

Bibliographic record

VenueRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDow Chemical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryFatty alcoholDerivatizationChromatographyMass spectrometryAlcoholElectrospray ionizationElectrospraySulfonic acidOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A derivatization procedure has been developed for the improved characterization of fatty alcohol ethoxylate non-ionic surfactants by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The end hydroxyl group of each surfactant species was converted into an oxycarbonylbenzene-2-sulfonic acid group with 2-sulfobenzoic anhydride under mild conditions. The produced sulfonic acid group allows all species, including fatty alcohols and those with less than three ethoxylates, to be uniformly ionized by electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry. Both acid and base can be used as a mobile phase additive for liquid chromatography without affecting M(n) and average ethoxylate values, although ion intensities are suppressed during the ESI process. The method was used to analyze seven commercial fatty alcohol ethoxylate non-ionic surfactants, and the determined M(n) and EO values were comparable with the results obtained by NMR. The relative ratio of different fatty alcohol based ethoxylates in a sample can also be determined using the summed mass spectral data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRapid Communications in Mass SpectrometrySame topicEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207