MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037655014 · doi:10.1504/ijspacese.2013.054464

Pressure induced active control mechanism for a pneumatically supported space tower

2013· article· en· W2037655014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Space Science and Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflatableMechanism (biology)TowerPressure controlControl (management)Control theory (sociology)Space (punctuation)Structural engineeringOrientation (vector space)Confined spaceControl systemEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringChemistryPhysicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development of an active control system based upon pressure induced control mechanisms to maintain the structural stability of an inflatable space tower. A pneumatically supported space tower comprises high structural strength fabric beams inflated at an appropriate pressure to maintain strength and structural configuration requires an active control mechanism to control attitude. A pressure control mechanism that utilises the differential change of pressure inside the inflated multiple-beam structure is investigated experimentally to determine its ability to maintain vertical orientation. Results indicate that the pressure induced control mechanisms can efficiently control the attitude of the large inflated structure such as pneumatically supported space tower.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it