MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037688351 · doi:10.5555/545381.545430

I/O-optimal algorithms for planar graphs using separators

2002· article· en· W2037688351 on OpenAlexaff
Anil Maheshwari, Norbert Zeh

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on Discrete Algorithms · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlanar graphPlanar straight-line graphBreadth-first searchPlanarAlgorithmBook embeddingComputer scienceEmbeddingOuterplanar graphVertex (graph theory)Depth-first searchGraphSearch algorithmPathwidthTheoretical computer scienceLine graphArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present I/O-optimal algorithms for several fundamental problems on planar graphs. Our main contribution is an I/O-efficient algorithm for computing a small vertex separator of an unweighted planar graph. This algorithm is superior to all existing external memory algorithms for this problem, as it requires neither a breadth-first search tree nor an embedding of the graph as part of the input. In fact, we derive I/O-optimal algorithms for planar embedding, breadth-first search, depth-first search, single source shortest paths, and computing weighted separators of planar graphs from our unweighted separator algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposium on Discrete AlgorithmsSame topicComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsFrench-language works237,207