MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037688351 · doi:10.5555/545381.545430

I/O-optimal algorithms for planar graphs using separators

2002· article· en· W2037688351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on Discrete Algorithms · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlanar graphPlanar straight-line graphBreadth-first searchPlanarAlgorithmBook embeddingComputer scienceEmbeddingOuterplanar graphVertex (graph theory)Depth-first searchGraphSearch algorithmPathwidthTheoretical computer scienceLine graphArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present I/O-optimal algorithms for several fundamental problems on planar graphs. Our main contribution is an I/O-efficient algorithm for computing a small vertex separator of an unweighted planar graph. This algorithm is superior to all existing external memory algorithms for this problem, as it requires neither a breadth-first search tree nor an embedding of the graph as part of the input. In fact, we derive I/O-optimal algorithms for planar embedding, breadth-first search, depth-first search, single source shortest paths, and computing weighted separators of planar graphs from our unweighted separator algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it