MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037733585 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m103739200

Directional Resolution of Synthetic Holliday Structures by the Cre Recombinase

2001· article· en· W2037733585 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Lee, Paul D. Sadowski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolliday junctionRecombinaseCre recombinaseComputational biologySynthetic biologyBiologyGeneticsRecombinationDNAHomologous recombinationTransgeneGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cre recombinase of bacteriophage P1 cleaves its target site, loxP, in a defined order. Recombination is initiated on one pair of strands to form a Holliday intermediate, which is then resolved by cleavage and exchange of the other pair of strands to yield recombinant products. To investigate the influence of the loxP sequence on the directionality of resolution, we constructed synthetic Holliday (chi) structures containing either wild-type or mutant lox sites. We found that Cre preferentially resolved the synthetic wild-type chi structures on a particular pair of strands. The bias in the direction of resolution was dictated by the asymmetric loxP sequence since the resolution bias was abolished with symmetric lox sites. Systematic substitutions of the loxP site revealed that the bases immediately 5' to the scissile phosphodiester bonds were primarily responsible for the directionality of resolution. Interchanging these base pairs was sufficient to reverse the resolution bias. The Cre-lox co-crystal structures show that Lys(86) makes a base-specific contact with guanine immediately 5' to one of the scissile phosphates. Substituting Lys(86) with alanine resulted in a reduction of the resolution bias, indicating that this amino acid is important for establishing the bias in resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicStructural Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207