MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037753759 · doi:10.1081/ss-200026716

A Concept for the Estimation of HETS for Rare Earth Separations in Extraction Columns

2004· article· en· W2037753759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation Science and Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtraction (chemistry)ChemistryColumn (typography)Component (thermodynamics)Phase diagramSeparation (statistics)Phase (matter)Range (aeronautics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsChromatographyThermodynamicsGeometryMaterials scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An approach is proposed to estimate the height equivalent to a theoretical stage (HETS) for multicomponent rare earth separations in extraction columns. Based on the steady concentration profiles of rare earths in the two phases along the extraction column height and the separation factor, a graphical diagram is constructed to determine the number of theoretical stages. The ratio of the two component concentrations in the organic phase and the ratio of the two component concentrations in the aqueous phase times the separation factor are plotted against the height of the column. Rectangular steps are drawn between these two lines to determine the number of theoretical stages and thus HETS. The average HETS for Nd/Pr separation was in the range of 0.86-1.06m under tested conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it