MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037763918 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2014-042-1

Compact Commutators of Rough Singular Integral Operators

2014· article· en· W2037763918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsCommutatorSingular integralOperator (biology)Singular integral operatorsKernel (algebra)Zero (linguistics)Mathematical analysisCompact operatorPure mathematicsStrictly singular operatorHomogeneousFourier integral operatorUnit sphereSingular valueOperator theoryFinite-rank operatorCombinatoricsQuasinormal operatorAlgebra over a fieldIntegral equationBanach spaceEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let b ∊ BMO(ℝ n ) and T Ω be the singular integral operator with kernel Ω( x )/| x | n , where Ω is homogeneous of degree zero, integrable, and has mean value zero on the unit sphere S n-1 . In this paper, using Fourier transform estimates and approximation to the operator T Ω by integral operators with smooth kernels, it is proved that if b ∊ CMO(ℝ n ) and satisfies certain minimal size condition, then the commutator generated by b and T Ω is a compact operator on L p (ℝ n ) for appropriate index p . The associated maximal operator is also considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it