Test of SAGD Flow-Distribution-Control Liner System in the Surmont Field, Alberta, Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary The Surmont Well Pair 102-06 started steam-assisted-gravity drainage (SAGD) operation in April 2009 with flow-distribution control (FDC) built into the horizontal liners for both the injection and the production wells. After preheat steam circulation, this liner system has allowed operation without a toe tubing string in either completion and has delivered superior steam-chamber development and overall performance. The design also allowed reducing the liner and casing size for the injection well. Future SAGD-well design may benefit by further reduction in liner and casing sizes for both the injector and producer, which could allow longer completions by reducing liner drag and increasing directional-drilling flexibility. Ultimately, these SAGD-well design changes could increase the amount of reservoir developed per well and per well pad, using longer wells and more wells per pad while achieving superior SAGD performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it