MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037787328 · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.9905062

Deficiency of Lamellar Bodies in Alveolar Type II Cells Associated with Fatal Respiratory Disease in a Full-term Infant

2000· article· en· W2037787328 on OpenAlexaff
Ernest Cutz, Susan E. Wert, Lawrence M. Nogee, Aideen M. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsLamellar granulePathologyMedicineAlveolar cellsRespiratory distressParenchymaLungRespiratory systemPulmonary surfactantRespiratory diseasePulmonary alveolar proteinosisRespiratory failurePneumonitisBiologyUltrastructureInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case of a full-term female infant who presented with severe respiratory distress shortly after birth and died at 23 d of age with unremitting respiratory failure. Infectious and other known causes of respiratory disease in this clinical setting were excluded. Examination of a lung biopsy showed abnormal lung parenchyma with features reminiscent of desquamative interstitial pneumonitis. Ultrastructural studies revealed that alveolar type II cells lacked cytoplasmic lamellar bodies, while other organelles appeared normal. Histochemical and immunohistochemical investigations indicated normal alveolar type II cell marker expression including surfactant proteins (SP-A, SP-B, pro-SP-B, and pro-SP-C). Mutations in the coding sequences of the SP-B gene were excluded as a cause of disease. This case appears to be a novel congenital defect affecting the pulmonary surfactant system. The cellular abnormality may involve the assembly of cytoplasmic lamellar bodies in alveolar type II cells-the principal storage site of pulmonary surfactant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207