MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037790147 · doi:10.1109/socialcom.2010.184

User's Perspective: Privacy and Security of Information on Social Networks

2010· article· en· W2037790147 on OpenAlexafffund
Caroline Ngeno, Pavol Zavarsky, Dale Lindskog, Ron Ruhl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsConcordia University of Edmonton
FundersConcordia UniversityConcordia University of Edmonton
KeywordsComputer sciencePerspective (graphical)Internet privacyFocus (optics)Social network (sociolinguistics)World Wide WebPopulationSample (material)Information privacyPrivate information retrievalTest (biology)Scale (ratio)Computer securitySocial mediaSociologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this study was to test the broader applicability of the findings in the 2009 research by L. Sørensen and K. Skouby, titled "Next Generation Social Networks - What Users Want". Their small-scale study, that examined high-level user requirements of future web-based social networks, showed that "users have high concerns towards the handling of their private data in web-based social networks generally calling for a higher focus on securing trust and privacy". With a sample population from various age groups and backgrounds such as environmental health, math, chemistry and information technology we found their results are not directly applicable to the general population of social networking site users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207