MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037797166 · doi:10.1088/0741-3335/50/8/085015

Magnetorotational instabilities in a dusty plasma

2008· article· en· W2037797166 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMagnetorotational instabilityDusty plasmaPlasmaMagnetohydrodynamic driveDispersion relationMagnetohydrodynamicsRotation (mathematics)InstabilityElectric fieldMechanicsClassical mechanicsQuantum electrodynamicsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The charged dust effect on stability of a magnetized rotating plasma is analysed using approximation of immobile dust. In the presence of the dust, a term with the electric field appears in the one-fluid equation of plasma motion. This electric field affects the equilibrium plasma rotation and also gives rise to a family of instabilities of the rotating plasma called dust-induced rotational instabilities (DRIs). The DRIs are related to the charge imbalance between the plasma ions and electrons because of the charged dust. In contrast to the well-known magnetorotational instability driven by the radially decreasing plasma rotation frequency, the DRI can appear for an arbitrary rotation frequency profile. A mathematical technique for the analysis of the magnetorotational phenomena is presented. It is based on the one-fluid magnetohydrodynamic approach developed for a pure plasma and generalized to include the immobile dust effects. The mode equation and local dispersion relation are derived in terms of the canonical parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it