Riding the Boom: Labour Market Experiences of New Generation Youth from Visible Minority Immigrant Families
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With changes in the source of origin of immigrants, a new cohort of new generation youth from visible minority immigrant families has begun to be established and become the key replacement of the aging Canadian labour force. Based on existing research, being young, being visible, and coming from an immigrant family are possible disadvantages in the labour market. Research on this new generation youth, however, is limited. This paper reports findings of two qualitative studies examining how this new generation youth, with or without a university degree, found work and what kinds of resources they used in their job search. The economic boom in British Columbia has offered easy access to the labour market. Coming from an immigrant family, however, visible minority youth benefit very little from their social ties and those of their family. Une nouvelle cohorte de jeunes provenant de nouveaux pays d'émigration et dont les familles appartiennent à des minorités visibles ont commencé à s'établir au Canada et à devenir la clé du remplacement de la population active vieillissante. Selon la recherche existante, être jeune, être visible et issu d'une famille d'immigrants peuvent être des inconvénients sur le marché du travail. La recherche sur cette nouvelle génération de jeunes, cependant, est limitée. Ce document présente les résultats de deux études qualitatives en examinant comment cette nouvelle génération de jeunes trouve du travail et les types de ressources qu'ils utilisent dans leur recherche d'emploi, avec ou sans un diplôme universitaire. Le boom économique en Colombie-Britannique a offert un accès facile au marché du travail. Cependant, venant d'une famille d'immigrants, les jeunes des minorités visibles bénéficient très peu de leurs liens sociaux et de ceux de leur famille.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".