MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037847814 · doi:10.1080/08940886.2016.1124678

Third International Workshop of the Soochow University–Western University Centre for Synchrotron Radiation Research

2016· article· en· W2037847814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSynchrotron Radiation News · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchrotron radiationChinaSynchrotronLibrary sciencePolitical scienceEngineering physicsEngineeringPhysicsComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following the two previous international workshops successfully held in 2012 [1 Y. Song, Synchrotron Radiation News 26(2), 39 (2013).[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]] and 2014 [2 Y. Song, Synchrotron Radiation News 27(5), 25–26 (2014).[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]], both in Suzhou, China, the Third International Workshop on Synchrotron Radiation Research took place on July 16, 2015, on the campus of the University of Western Ontario (also known as Western University), London, Ontario, Canada, for the first time. The workshop was sponsored by the Soochow University–Western University Centre (SWC or the Centre) for Synchrotron Radiation Research and hosted by Western University, with financial support from Western's Interdisciplinary Development Initiative (IDI) program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it