MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037872780 · doi:10.7202/010350ar

« Connaître, comme une naissance » : la logique générative de la philosophie religieuse selon Franz Von Baader (1765‑1841)*

2005· article· fr· W2037872780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLaval théologique et philosophique · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophical and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Franz von Baader, « le philosophe romantique par excellence », a lui-même désigné ses Leçons de philosophie religieuse de 1827 comme la porte d’entrée « logique » de son système de pensée. Développant un commentaire fouillé de ce texte déconcertant et difficile, l’A. décrit la théorie baadérienne de la connaissance qui s’y exprime comme une reprise puissante de l’épistémologie thomiste face à la critique kantienne. L’originalité profonde de Baader se prend du cadre théosophique dans lequel il inscrit sa lecture de l’Aquinate, ainsi confronté à la vision trinitaire de Boehme en particulier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it