Mechanism of Polyuria after Cisplatin Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cisplatin is an antineoplastic agent. Several nephrotoxic effects are associated with its use including chronic and acute renal failure, renal magnesium wasting, and polyuria. We have investigated polyuria in groups of rats treated with cisplatin at doses of 2.5 and 5 mg/kg body weight given once weekly for 3 weeks to determine possible mechanisms of this impairment. After cisplatin administration, glomerular filtration rate was reduced and significant increases in sodium and water loss were also seen. These changes were associated with decreases in urinary cAMP. Inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cells were removed from these animals and were stimulated with graded doses of vasopressin. Cells from cisplatin-treated rats showed an impaired response in cAMP generation to vasopressin stimulation as compared to cells from normal animals. To determine more precisely the site of impairment, the adenylate cyclase complex of the IMCD cells was further studied with forskolin and NaF. Forskolin was used to probe the catalytic unit activating adenylate cyclase, and NaF the guanine nucleotide regulatory protein (G protein). In response to forskolin, cells from cisplatin-treated rats and normal rats responded similarly in generating cAMP. However, following NaF, the cAMP response was blunted in the cells from the cisplatin rats. These results suggested that the catalytic unit was not injured by cisplatin (forskolin study) but the G protein was (NaF). In conclusion, the present study suggests that the polyuria seen following cisplatin administration is associated with an end-organ resistance to vasopressin manifested by reduced cAMP generation, secondary in part or whole to a defect at the level of the G protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".