MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037889797 · doi:10.1039/b504191k

Ab initio study of chiral recognition in the propylene imine·hydrogen peroxide complex

2005· article· en· W2037889797 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Su, Yunjie Xu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryImineAb initioHydrogen peroxideComputational chemistryCounterpoiseMoleculeEnantiomerAb initio quantum chemistry methodsDissociation (chemistry)Basis setPhysical chemistryCrystallographyStereochemistryDensity functional theoryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High level ab initio calculations were employed to study the chiral recognition effect in several chiral molecular pairs that consist of the propylene imine and hydrogen peroxide molecules. The potential energy surfaces for the complexes formed between S-cis-1,2-propylene imine and the two enantiomeric forms of hydrogen peroxide were constructed, using the calculated interaction energies at different separations and orientations. The energy calculations were done using the MOLPRO suite of programs with CCSD(T)/cc-pVDZ. The energies were counterpoise corrected at every point to eliminate the basis set superposition error. Complete geometry optimizations were further carried out for the molecular complexes consisting of the cis- or trans-propylene imine isomers and the two enantiomeric forms of hydrogen peroxide. The geometry optimizations were done using the Gaussian 98 and 03 suites of programs, with MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ being the highest level used. Altogether, eight stable complexes were identified, and the corresponding dissociation energies were calculated with MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ. The largest chirodiastaltic energy is found at 0.74 kcal mol(-1) for the (syn)trans-propylene imine.hydrogen peroxide complexes, where hydrogen peroxide acts as a hydrogen donor and is on the opposite side of the ring from the methyl group. The rotational constants, dipole moments, and harmonic frequencies of the complexes are presented to assist future spectroscopic investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207