MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037892858 · doi:10.1021/jp002851z

Gas-Phase Spectroscopy of the Unstable Acetonitrile <i>N</i>-Oxide Molecule, CH<sub>3</sub>CNO

2001· article· en· W2037892858 on OpenAlexafffund
Tibor Pasinszki, Nicholas P. C. Westwood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryDensity functional theoryMoleculeSpectroscopyAcetonitrileIsomerizationAb initioDimerComputational chemistryUltraviolet photoelectron spectroscopyPhotoionizationInfrared spectroscopyPhysical chemistryElectronic structureOrganic chemistryIonization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unstable acetonitrile N -oxide molecule, CH 3 CNO, has been thermolytically generated in very high yield in the gas phase from its stable ring dimer, dimethylfuroxan, and studied by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy, photoionization mass spectroscopy, and mid-infrared spectroscopy. The individual spectroscopies provide a detailed investigation into the vibrational and electronic character of the molecule, and are supported by both conventional ab initio calculations and density functional theory. The ground-state structure is also investigated by theory at the B3-LYP, MP n ( n = 2−4), QCISD, and QCISD(T) levels with medium to large basis sets, and illustrates the need for a precise description of electron correlation. Given that both isomerization and dimerization are feasible loss processes for this unstable molecule, the relative stability of CH 3 CNO with respect to the known cyanate (CH 3 OCN), isocyanate (CH 3 NCO), and fulminate (CH 3 ONC) isomers and the mechanism of the dimerization processes were studied with density functional theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207